Authors: Hamz a Ates, Mehmet Duman, Yuksel Bayraktar
Download full article here: Egypt under stress
Date Published: June 2006
This article proves as a good supplement to that of the previous post. The past four decades of Egypt’s economic history are lucidly outlined. This includes a description of the pre-Infitah atmosphere, the pressures in transition, and the policies of Mubarak leading up to the revolution. Because the article was written in 2006, the connection between this economic transformation and the uprising are not made. However, the article discusses that one of the major consequences of liberalization was that of enhanced budget deficits. WIth these deficits, came restructuring polices which included some fairly drastic austerity measures, including reduced government subsidies to the poor and cuts in social services. These measures were pushed on the Egyptian people in a time when there was large numbers of unemployed and a stagnant real wage. Could these dramatic economic conditions pushed the Egyptian youth (who were experiencing levels of unemployment greater than 20%) to the street?
Full article available for download here: Egypt’s Infitah
Source: Middle Eastern Studies, Vol 21, No. 2 (April., 1985)
Marvin G. Weinbaum
This paper gives necessary insight for anyone interested in Egypt’s socioeconomic transition away from the socialist leaning government of Gamal Abdul Nassar towards what was described as “free market” capitalism under Sadat. Weinbaum discusses the influence of U.S. aid on the Egyptian administration, how that aid policy changed, and how Egypt’s Infitah (opening) may not have been an opening at all.
Too Much Civil Society, Too Little Politics: Egypt and Liberalizing Arab Regimes
Date published: January 2004
By Vickie Langohr ; Download here: Too much civil society
This article provides a interesting perspective on the ability of the liberal reform agenda, which was implemented in the 1990s in much of the MENA states, to bring about democratization. Langohr discusses the interaction that authoritarian states have in the region with civil society, particularly the influence of nongovernmental organizations as opposition to authority. Her findings are quite bleak. It appears that liberalization did not directly bring about democratic reforms in these countries. However, in light of the recent ArabSpring, its curious to ask if maybe these liberalizations are in part responsible for the mass uprisings that occurred in this region. I would argue that this is the case.
“Egypt’s economy is growing at its fastest pace in years, exports are surging and the bourse is booming, but there is little sign yet of an economic revival in the poor suburbs and crowded slums of the capital”
This article from Al Jazeera English describes a pre-uprising atmosphere in Egypt where the country’s poor saw little befit from the country’s growing economy. At the turn of the century, the Mubarak administration, in accordance with its structural adjustment package, privatized much of the country’s state run businesses. This led to massive lay off of Egyptian workers. Official unemployments estimates at the time were around 10 percent, however, unofficial estimates, which include jobs outside of recognized labor, placed the unemployment rate at levels up to twice that number. With roughly 20 percent of the population unemployed, the government cutting its public sector, and reducing its provided social services to reduce its deficit, its no wonder that people took to the streets in rage.
Full article available here.
Promoting Economic Liberalization In Egypt: From U.S. Foreign Aid to Trade and Investment
By Bessma Momani in the Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol. 7. No. 3 (September 2003)
Full article available for download here – Promoting Economic Liberalization in Egypt
Bessma Momani describes how the Mubarak administration was put under pressure by the United States to liberalize their economy in the 1990s. This had come after several years of liberalization in Egypt but was now centered on the opening up of international markets. The pressure from the United States had less to do with the success of the reforms and more to do with Egypt as a strategic ally in the Middle East. For this reason, aid from the U.S. has never stopped and was $2 billion annually in 2003. The article also discusses, in some detail, the complications of starting a Free Trade Agreement between the two nations. It would be interesting to hear a dissuasion from Momani on how these reforms affected the Egyptian economy in later years, and how the relationship has changed since the uprising.
This article by Timothy Mitchell, which was published in Review of African Political Economy in 1999, gives a telling account of liberal adjustments in the Egyptian economy during the 1990s. Mitchell explains how neoliberal reforms in Egypt actually accomplished very little of what they set out to achieve. Much of the economic “progress” seen during this period, according to at the article, was influenced by a host of factors not normally acknowledged by advocates of the reforms. For example, the success of the banking sector after its collapse was greatly funded by the state. Or, how although the reforms were intended to create an export boom, they actually hurt exports and instead created a massive and unwarranted boom in domestic construction projects. This article gives an excellent examination into Egypt’s structural reforms of the 1990s and provides a critical analysis that is difficult to find.
PDF can be accessed here: the logic of neoliberalism in egypt.
“Decades of neoliberal economic policies have concentrated wealth and are now spurring a global backlash.”
Full article available here.
This article by Juan Cole provides a exemplary illustration of the argument currently being developed by this blog. Cole describes how in countries all over the world, like Egypt and the United States, young rebels are reacting to a single stunning worldwide development: the extreme concentration of wealth in a few hands thanks to neoliberal policies of deregulation and union busting. This is in a sense the exact argument I have been researching. The connecting tie among social movements around the world is that of inequality. The polices of neoliberalism enacted after capitalism’s structural crisis of the 1970s have concentrated wealth in the hands of less and less. The uprising in Egypt was not only an attack on an unruly dictator but also attack on the policies that that dictator allowed to occur. It was an uprising against repression, including repression of labor power. It was a revolt against corruption, including the ties between the ruling elite and economic elite. Neoliberal reforms were at the heart of the complaints of the Egyptian revolution, as they are with social movements around the world.